Agile Retrospective Question Generator

Fresh retro prompts to improve your team

Free agile retrospective question generator with went-well, improve, and action prompts plus full retro formats — Starfish, 4Ls, and Mad/Sad/Glad. Built for scrum masters and team leads who want fresh prompts every sprint, all in your browser. It runs free in your browser on Gera Tools, with nothing uploaded.

Last updated Source: Gera Tools

What is the difference between focus mode and format mode?

Focus mode draws a random set of prompts about one theme — what went well, what to improve, or actions. Format mode returns the complete prompt set for a named retrospective framework so you can run the whole exercise.

Retros lose their punch when you ask the same three questions every sprint. This agile retrospective question generator keeps prompts fresh: pull a random set around a single theme, or load a complete framework like Starfish, 4Ls, or Mad/Sad/Glad to structure the whole session.

The two modes and when to use each

Focus mode is best when you have limited time or a specific problem to address. You choose a theme — what went well, improvements, or action items — and the tool draws a fresh random set from a built-in bank using a Fisher–Yates shuffle. This gives you a targeted ten-minute conversation rather than a full ceremony.

Format mode returns the complete, canonical prompt set for a named retrospective framework. Use it when you want a structured, full-length session with a clear arc from reflection to action:

  • Starfish (Keep / Start / Stop / More / Less) — maps five zones that together produce a balanced picture of what is working, what is not, and what needs calibration.
  • 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For) — drives reflection on value and growth alongside gaps, which suits teams that want to emphasise learning.
  • Mad/Sad/Glad — introduces an emotional lens that is particularly effective after a stressful sprint, a failed feature, or a team conflict. Naming feelings first lowers defensiveness before moving to analysis.

Why format variety matters

A team that uses the same three columns — What went well? / What didn’t? / What to try? — every sprint for six months stops generating new answers. Participants mentally fill in the box before the meeting starts. Switching to 4Ls asks “what did we learn?” which is a meaningfully different question that surfaces knowledge capture and team growth rather than just task outcomes.

Tips for running better retros

  • Start with positives regardless of how the sprint went. Opening with “what went well” before “what to improve” prevents the session from becoming a complaint list and tends to produce more actionable improvement ideas.
  • Always end with owned action items. A retro without commitments is a therapy session, not a process improvement meeting. Use one or two action prompts and name a specific person and deadline for each.
  • Timebox each question. In a 45-minute retro with five Starfish prompts, five minutes per prompt keeps the session moving and prevents one topic from consuming the whole meeting.
  • Rotate formats month to month. Familiar teams extract more insight from a new lens than from a repeated one — novelty forces fresh thinking.
  • Copy a generated set directly into your digital whiteboard or retro doc as column headers; most tools (Miro, FigJam, Retrium) accept pasted text as board sections.