When you are choosing which export markets to chase first, you need a fast, consistent way to rank them. This estimator combines a market’s GDP per capita, its population, and an industry trade-intensity coefficient into a rough addressable-market figure, then applies your target share to estimate export revenue potential.
How it works
The model follows a straightforward top-down chain:
spend_per_capita = gdp_per_capita × trade_intensity
addressable_market = population × spend_per_capita
export_potential = addressable_market × target_share
The trade-intensity coefficient is the lever that adapts the model to your product category — it represents the share of GDP per capita that buyers in a market typically spend on imported goods of that type. The tool includes illustrative coefficients by industry that you can override with better data from customs statistics or industry reports.
Why GDP per capita — not total GDP
Total GDP tells you the size of the economy, but it combines a small number of very wealthy consumers with a large number of low-income earners in ways that can mislead market prioritisation. GDP per capita captures average purchasing power, which drives how much each person can actually spend on your category.
The difference matters when comparing:
- A market of 5 million people at $40,000 GDP per capita: addressable market may be larger despite smaller population
- A market of 50 million people at $3,000 GDP per capita: large population but lower per-person spend on imports
The model separates these effects explicitly, giving you a spending estimate per person that you then scale by population.
Worked example
Packaged food exporter evaluating two markets. Illustrative trade-intensity coefficient for packaged food: 2.5%.
| Market | GDP/capita | Population | Spend/person | Addressable | 2% share = potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market A | $12,000 | 10M | $300 | $3.0B | $60M |
| Market B | $25,000 | 4M | $625 | $2.5B | $50M |
Market A ranks higher by addressable market, but Market B’s higher per-capita income may mean lower price sensitivity and easier margin maintenance. Both figures would then be validated against actual customs import data before committing market-entry budget.
What the model ignores — and why that is intentional
This is a prioritisation heuristic, not a demand forecast. It intentionally excludes:
- Tariffs and non-tariff barriers — a 20% import duty fundamentally changes the competitive position but varies by product HS code and bilateral trade agreements.
- Local production competition — a market may have high GDP per capita but be self-sufficient in your category.
- Logistics cost and market access — shipping cost to a landlocked country can eliminate the margin advantage.
- Competitor presence — incumbent exporters may hold large market share already.
Use the output to shortlist markets, then validate the top three to five with real customs and trade-flow statistics (UN Comtrade, ITC Trade Map, national customs databases) before making investment decisions.