Right-to-repair rules increasingly require manufacturers to make products repairable: spare parts must be available, instructions published, and devices designed so common failures can be reached without specialist tools. This scorer turns those factors into a single weighted repairability index so you can compare designs and spot gaps before launch.
The regulatory landscape driving this tool
Several overlapping regulatory frameworks are pushing repairability into product design requirements:
- EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR): extends the original Energy-Related Products rules to a much broader set of goods, mandating spare-parts availability, repair instructions, and disassembly depth for product categories being phased in from 2025 onward.
- EU Right to Repair Directive (adopted 2024): gives consumers the legal right to have goods repaired by the manufacturer or authorized third parties for a set period after purchase, at a reasonable price. Applies to smartphones, tablets, computers, washing machines, dishwashers, and more.
- UK Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act and Right to Repair regulations: UK has adopted equivalent measures largely mirroring EU requirements post-Brexit, covering similar product categories.
- France’s Repairability Index (indice de réparabilité): a scored label from 0–10 required on consumer electronics sold in France since 2021, formally assessing documentation, disassembly, spare-parts availability, price of parts, and broader repairability criteria.
This tool approximates the spirit of these frameworks as a product-design triage aid, not an official compliance document.
How it works
Five factors are each rated 0 to 10 and combined with weights:
factors: spare parts, documentation, disassembly depth,
tool requirements, software/support duration
score (0–100) = Σ(rating × weight) / Σ(weight) × 10
Spare-parts availability and disassembly depth carry the heaviest default weights because they most directly determine whether a repair is even possible. The lowest-scoring factors are surfaced first so remediation effort goes where it moves the index most.
Scoring guide for each factor
Spare parts (highest weight):
- 0 = no parts sold externally, proprietary assembly only
- 5 = some parts available through authorized dealers at elevated prices
- 10 = all serviceable parts publicly available, competitively priced, sold for the full required duration
Documentation:
- 0 = no service documentation published
- 5 = user manual only; no repair or disassembly guide
- 10 = full service manuals, schematic diagrams, and diagnostic software available to independent repairers
Disassembly depth:
- 0 = chassis is glued or ultrasonically welded; no non-destructive entry
- 5 = standard screws but adhesive-bonded battery/screen
- 10 = all serviceable components reachable non-destructively with common tools; common failure points near the top of the disassembly tree
Tool requirements:
- 0 = requires proprietary tools or jigs unavailable on the open market
- 5 = standard Torx or Phillips; one or two specialty bits needed
- 10 = entirely standard tools (Phillips, flat, hex); no proprietary fasteners
Software/support duration:
- 0 = updates stopped before product reached market; no reset/unlock available
- 5 = 2–3 years of security updates from date of purchase
- 10 = minimum 7–10 years of security updates from last unit sold; device unlockable for third-party software after support ends
Notes
A high hardware score is undermined by short software support — a phone you can open in two minutes is still e-waste once security updates stop. Aim for spare parts that are both available and affordable relative to the new product price; regulators look at the ratio of part price to device price. This index is a design-stage triage aid, not the official Ecodesign or French repairability/durability index — validate against the binding methodology for your specific product group before claiming compliance.