Net Zero Target Pathway Calculator

Build a linear or science-based net zero reduction pathway from base year

Generate a year-by-year net zero emission-reduction pathway from a base year using a linear target, the SBTi 1.5°C rate (4.2% per year), or the well-below-2°C rate (2.5% per year). See required annual reduction, target-year emissions, and cumulative carbon budget. Runs in your browser. It runs free in your browser on Gera Tools, with nothing uploaded.

Last updated Source: Gera Tools

What annual reduction rate does SBTi require?

For near-term 1.5°C-aligned targets, SBTi's absolute contraction approach requires a minimum linear reduction of about 4.2% of base-year emissions every year. Well-below-2°C alignment requires at least 2.5% per year. This tool applies those fixed rates.

A credible net zero plan is a year-by-year trajectory, not a single distant promise. This calculator turns a base-year footprint and a target year into a concrete reduction pathway with annual milestones, the required pace, and the cumulative carbon budget you are committing to.

How it works

The tool builds the pathway from a constant absolute reduction each year:

SBTi 1.5°C:  annual reduction = base emissions × 4.2%
SBTi 2°C:    annual reduction = base emissions × 2.5%
linear:      annual reduction = (base − residual) / (target year − base year)

emissions(year) = base − annual reduction × (year − base year)
carbon budget   = sum of emissions across every year on the path

The SBTi modes apply a fixed share of the base year every year — the absolute contraction approach — so the line is straight and the pace never slackens. The linear mode lets you aim at a custom residual you plan to neutralise at the end with carbon removals.

The three pathway types compared

ModeAnnual reduction basisUse when
SBTi 1.5°C4.2% of base-year emissionsAiming for the most ambitious near-term science-based target
SBTi well-below 2°C2.5% of base-year emissionsNear-term target with slightly lower ambition
Custom linearDivide total required reduction by yearsYou have a corporate target that doesn’t match an SBTi rate

Why the carbon budget matters more than the endpoint

A pathway that delays steep cuts may still reach the same 2040 endpoint as a front-loaded one, but the area under the curve — the cumulative carbon budget — will be larger. Because warming is driven by total cumulative CO2 in the atmosphere, a late-steepening path does more physical damage than an early-steepening one, even at identical endpoints. This calculator shows the budget as a sum of annual emissions so you can compare pathways on that metric, not just the final year.

Worked example

A company at 50,000 tCO2e in 2025 on the SBTi 1.5°C path must cut 50,000 × 4.2% = 2,100 tCO2e every year. By 2040 (15 years) that is 15 × 2,100 = 31,500 tCO2e removed, leaving roughly 18,500 tCO2e. The cumulative budget over the path is the sum of each year’s emissions from 50,000 down to ~18,500 — roughly 514,000 tCO2e across the 15 years.

For genuine net zero, the residual 18,500 tCO2e would then need to be permanently neutralised by high-quality removals. Set that figure as the residual target in the linear mode to see what additional removal obligations you are implicitly accepting.

Common planning mistakes

  • Treating the target year as net zero. Reaching a reduced-emissions level is not net zero unless the residual is also covered by durable removals.
  • Using a percentage-of-prior-year reduction. Compounding a percentage reduction off each year’s smaller base looks the same in year one but tapers too slowly by year five. SBTi’s absolute contraction method is deliberately more demanding.
  • Ignoring scope boundaries. A pathway that covers only Scope 1 and 2 may miss a Scope 3 footprint that is five times larger. Always clarify which scopes are in base-year emissions before setting the target.