A credible net zero plan is a year-by-year trajectory, not a single distant promise. This calculator turns a base-year footprint and a target year into a concrete reduction pathway with annual milestones, the required pace, and the cumulative carbon budget you are committing to.
How it works
The tool builds the pathway from a constant absolute reduction each year:
SBTi 1.5°C: annual reduction = base emissions × 4.2%
SBTi 2°C: annual reduction = base emissions × 2.5%
linear: annual reduction = (base − residual) / (target year − base year)
emissions(year) = base − annual reduction × (year − base year)
carbon budget = sum of emissions across every year on the path
The SBTi modes apply a fixed share of the base year every year — the absolute contraction approach — so the line is straight and the pace never slackens. The linear mode lets you aim at a custom residual you plan to neutralise at the end with carbon removals.
The three pathway types compared
| Mode | Annual reduction basis | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| SBTi 1.5°C | 4.2% of base-year emissions | Aiming for the most ambitious near-term science-based target |
| SBTi well-below 2°C | 2.5% of base-year emissions | Near-term target with slightly lower ambition |
| Custom linear | Divide total required reduction by years | You have a corporate target that doesn’t match an SBTi rate |
Why the carbon budget matters more than the endpoint
A pathway that delays steep cuts may still reach the same 2040 endpoint as a front-loaded one, but the area under the curve — the cumulative carbon budget — will be larger. Because warming is driven by total cumulative CO2 in the atmosphere, a late-steepening path does more physical damage than an early-steepening one, even at identical endpoints. This calculator shows the budget as a sum of annual emissions so you can compare pathways on that metric, not just the final year.
Worked example
A company at 50,000 tCO2e in 2025 on the SBTi 1.5°C path must cut 50,000 × 4.2% = 2,100 tCO2e every year. By 2040 (15 years) that is 15 × 2,100 = 31,500 tCO2e removed, leaving roughly 18,500 tCO2e. The cumulative budget over the path is the sum of each year’s emissions from 50,000 down to ~18,500 — roughly 514,000 tCO2e across the 15 years.
For genuine net zero, the residual 18,500 tCO2e would then need to be permanently neutralised by high-quality removals. Set that figure as the residual target in the linear mode to see what additional removal obligations you are implicitly accepting.
Common planning mistakes
- Treating the target year as net zero. Reaching a reduced-emissions level is not net zero unless the residual is also covered by durable removals.
- Using a percentage-of-prior-year reduction. Compounding a percentage reduction off each year’s smaller base looks the same in year one but tapers too slowly by year five. SBTi’s absolute contraction method is deliberately more demanding.
- Ignoring scope boundaries. A pathway that covers only Scope 1 and 2 may miss a Scope 3 footprint that is five times larger. Always clarify which scopes are in base-year emissions before setting the target.