A full life cycle assessment is data-intensive and expensive, so practitioners screen for hotspots first — the lifecycle stages that dominate environmental impact. This simplified tool takes your relative intensity estimates for five lifecycle stages across two impact categories, normalises them into comparable shares, and produces a hotspot matrix plus a prioritised list of stages that justify a deep, quantitative LCA.
How it works
For each impact category the tool converts your raw stage scores into percentage shares of the category total:
share(stage, category) = score(stage, category) / Σ scores(category) × 100%
Any stage whose share reaches the hotspot threshold (20 percent, the point above an even five-way split) is flagged. To rank stages for a deep LCA the tool sums each stage’s CO2e and energy shares, so a stage that is hot in both categories rises to the top:
priority(stage) = CO2e share + energy share
This dual-category view surfaces both stages that dominate one impact and stages that are moderately significant across both.
Scoring guidance for each lifecycle stage
Your scores are relative, not absolute — they reflect where you estimate impacts concentrate compared with the other stages. You are answering: “If I had 100 points of impact to distribute across these five stages, how much goes where?”
| Stage | What to consider for CO2e | What to consider for energy |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | Mining/refining, upstream transportation, material mass and carbon intensity | Extraction energy, primary material processing (aluminium, steel, concrete are high) |
| Manufacturing | Energy source of factory, process steps, waste, packaging | Electricity and heat consumed in production processes |
| Logistics | Transport mode (air >> sea), total distance, load efficiency | Fuel per tonne-km; sea freight is ~50× lower than air per tonne |
| Use phase | Grid carbon intensity × kWh consumed over product lifetime | Total kWh drawn over product lifetime |
| End of life | Landfill methane, incineration, recycling avoidance credits | Energy to recycle or process; transportation to disposal |
Worked example: laptop computer
| Stage | CO2e score | Energy score | CO2e share | Energy share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | 40 | 35 | 40% — HOTSPOT | 35% — HOTSPOT |
| Manufacturing | 25 | 30 | 25% — HOTSPOT | 30% — HOTSPOT |
| Logistics | 5 | 5 | 5% | 5% |
| Use phase | 20 | 25 | 20% — threshold | 25% — HOTSPOT |
| End of life | 10 | 5 | 10% | 5% |
In this example, raw materials and manufacturing dominate both categories — the expected result for a device with aluminium body and lithium battery. The use phase is a hotspot for energy (and borderline for CO2e) because the device draws power for several years. Logistics and end-of-life are low-priority for a deep study.
How to use the output
The hotspot screen tells you where to spend LCA budget, not what the actual emission values are. Once the top one or two stages are identified, a full ISO 14040 / 14044 quantitative LCA focuses primary data collection and inventory analysis on those stages. Secondary data (literature averages, EcoInvent database figures) can handle the low-priority stages without materially affecting accuracy.
If a stage is borderline — exactly at the 20% threshold — include it in the deep study anyway; the score uncertainty from rough relative estimates is typically larger than the gap between hotspot and non-hotspot at the boundary.