A risk matrix turns two judgements — how likely harm is and how serious it would be — into a single rating that drives action priority. This calculator implements the standard UK HSE-style 5×5 and 3×3 matrices and then points you to the level of control the hierarchy of controls expects for that rating.
How it works
The core formula is simply the product of the two scores:
risk rating = likelihood × severity
On a 5×5 matrix this gives 1 to 25; on a 3×3 matrix it gives 1 to 9. The product is banded into low, medium, high, and intolerable. Higher bands demand controls from higher up the hierarchy:
Eliminate -> Substitute -> Engineering -> Administrative -> PPE
(most effective) (least effective)
Reading the 5×5 matrix bands
| Score range | Band | Typical required action |
|---|---|---|
| 1–4 | Low | Acceptable — record assessment, review annually |
| 5–9 | Medium | Act within defined timescale, improve controls |
| 10–15 | High | Act soon — additional controls required |
| 16–25 | Intolerable | Stop activity until risk reduced |
These thresholds follow common UK practice aligned with HSE guidance. Your organisation’s risk appetite may set slightly different cut-off points, which is why the calculator is flexible on band boundaries.
Worked example: working at height
Consider a maintenance worker cleaning gutters on a two-storey building without collective fall protection:
- Likelihood — 3 (“possible” — falls happen with regularity in this type of work if controls are absent)
- Severity — 4 (“major injury” — a fall from two storeys likely causes a broken limb or head injury at minimum)
- Score — 3 × 4 = 12 (High)
High demands “act soon.” The hierarchy of controls response is:
- Can the gutter be cleaned from the ground with a long-reach tool? (Eliminate the need to climb)
- If not, can a mobile elevated work platform replace the ladder? (Engineering)
- Can task frequency be reduced so the hazard arises less often? (Administrative)
- Is a safety harness the final layer, not the primary one? (PPE — last resort only)
After implementing a long-reach cleaning system, likelihood drops to 1 (rarely needed to climb at all), giving a new score of 1 × 4 = 4 (Low). The risk is controlled, but the assessment is not deleted — it is retained as evidence.
Choosing 5×5 versus 3×3
Use 5×5 for formal risk assessments in construction, manufacturing, or clinical environments where fine distinctions in likelihood (from “rare” to “almost certain”) and severity (from “trivial” to “fatal”) meaningfully change the response.
Use 3×3 for quick triage, operational hot-spots, or in settings where staff need a fast, memorable scoring process. Three simple bands are easier to apply consistently but sacrifice granularity.
Recording the assessment
A completed risk matrix is only useful if it is recorded. Good practice includes: the hazard description, who might be harmed and how, the pre-control score, the controls in place, the post-control (residual) score, the person responsible for the controls, and the review date. Under UK law (the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999), employers with five or more employees must record the significant findings of their risk assessment.