Hardness is measured several different ways, and shop drawings, mill certificates, and heat-treat specs rarely all use the same one. This calculator translates a value on one scale into its equivalents on the others for steel, so you can compare an HRC spec against a Brinell reading or a Vickers test without hunting through a printed chart.
The four scales and what each measures
Understanding what each test actually does clarifies why the conversions are approximate rather than exact.
Rockwell C (HRC) presses a diamond cone (Brale indenter) into the surface under a 150 kgf major load and measures the depth of penetration. It is fast, non-destructive for most parts, and covers the hardened-steel range from roughly 20 to 68 HRC. It is the most common scale on heat-treat specifications for tool steels, dies, and case-hardened components.
Brinell (HB or HBW) presses a 10 mm tungsten carbide ball under 3,000 kgf and measures the diameter of the resulting indentation. Because it uses a large indenter, it averages over a wider area and is better for inhomogeneous materials like cast iron and forgings. The test leaves a visible dent, and the scale tops out around 650 HB before the ball starts to deform.
Vickers (HV) uses a diamond pyramid under a small load (often 1–100 kgf) and measures the diagonal of the impression. Because the geometry is self-similar — the impression shape does not change with load — Vickers values are comparable across loads. This makes it the preferred master scale for conversion tables and for testing thin material, coatings, and case depths.
Rockwell B (HRB) uses a 1/16-inch steel ball under 100 kgf and suits softer materials (annealed steel, aluminium alloys, brass) in the range 0–100 HRB. Once a material hardens beyond 100 HRB it should be measured on the C scale instead.
How it works
Each hardness test pushes a different indenter into the surface under a different load, so there is no exact algebraic formula linking them. Instead, the industry relies on measured correlation tables. ASTM E140 publishes those tables for carbon and low-alloy steel, and this tool stores a condensed version with Vickers as the master column.
input value -> interpolate to Vickers (HV)
HV -> interpolate to HRC, HRB, HRA, HB
HV -> estimate tensile strength (ksi, then MPa)
When you enter a value, it is first converted to Vickers by linear interpolation between the nearest table rows, then Vickers is interpolated back out to every other scale. Any scale whose valid window does not include your value is marked out of range rather than extrapolated.
Hardness to tensile strength
For carbon and low-alloy steel there is a well-established empirical relationship between hardness and tensile strength. The tool uses the Vickers value to estimate tensile strength in both ksi and MPa. Treat this as a useful cross-check — for example, verifying that a hardness reading is consistent with a stated strength class — not as a replacement for a tensile test. The relationship does not hold for stainless steel, aluminium, or surface-treated parts.
Tips and limitations
These conversions apply only to carbon and low-alloy steels measured in the bulk material. Stainless steel, nickel alloys, and non-ferrous metals follow different correlation tables from ASTM E140 not included here. Case-hardened surfaces have a steep hardness gradient with depth that single-point conversion cannot capture. For acceptance testing, always measure on the scale your specification calls out rather than converting from another.