DALL·E 2 Size Picker

Pick the right DALL·E 2 size (256/512/1024px) with cost comparison

Free DALL·E 2 size picker comparing the 256×256, 512×512 and 1024×1024 options with per-image cost, quality trade-offs and recommended use cases for thumbnails, social media and print, with a live batch total. It runs free in your browser on Gera Tools, with nothing uploaded.

Last updated Source: Gera Tools

What sizes does DALL·E 2 support?

DALL·E 2 generates square images at 256×256, 512×512 or 1024×1024 pixels. Unlike DALL·E 3, it does not offer landscape or portrait aspect ratios, so all outputs are square.

DALL·E 2 size picker

DALL·E 2 offers three square sizes — 256×256, 512×512 and 1024×1024 — and the price difference between them is tiny. This picker shows the per-image cost, quality trade-offs and best use case for each, and gives you a batch total so you can choose with full information before generating.

Comparing the three sizes

SizePixelsBest forRelative cost
256×25665,536Icons, thumbnails, rapid prototypingLowest
512×512262,144In-feed social posts, app mockupsSlightly higher
1024×10241,048,576Final assets, print source, upscalingHighest (tiny margin)

The cost gap between the smallest and largest is only a fraction of a cent per image at OpenAI’s published rates, which is why the picker almost always recommends 1024×1024 unless you have a genuine reason to go smaller.

How it works

The tool maps each size to its published per-image rate and a recommended use. Because the cost gap between the smallest and largest is only a fraction of a cent, the recommendation usually favours generating at the largest size you might ever need and downscaling afterwards. Enter an image count to see the full batch total.

When smaller sizes do make sense

The main case for 256×256 is bulk disposable thumbnails — if you need hundreds of rough concept images for internal review and will never enlarge them, the lower per-image cost adds up. At 512×512 you get noticeably more detail than 256 while keeping a moderate file size, which suits in-feed social images where bandwidth matters. For anything you plan to use in production, 1024×1024 is the right choice.

DALL·E 2 vs DALL·E 3 — when to use which

DALL·E 2 is cheaper and supports two workflows DALL·E 3 does not: image editing (inpainting/outpainting) and image variations (generating riffs on an uploaded image). If your workflow involves editing existing images or exploring variations, DALL·E 2 is the appropriate model. For text-following accuracy and overall image quality on fresh generations, DALL·E 3 is clearly superior.

Tips

  • Default to 1024×1024. The extra resolution costs almost nothing and gives you room to crop and upscale from a single source.
  • DALL·E 2 is square-only. Unlike DALL·E 3 which has landscape and portrait options, every DALL·E 2 output is square — crop or add padding to fit non-square layouts.
  • Confirm current pricing. Rates may change; verify against your OpenAI billing dashboard before budgeting a large batch.
  • Variations and edits share the same size constraint. When using DALL·E 2’s edit and variation endpoints, the input and output image must match one of the three supported sizes.