The QTc interval is one of the most clinically important measurements derived from a standard 12-lead ECG. The raw QT interval — the time from the start of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave — shrinks at faster heart rates and lengthens at slower ones. Without correcting for heart rate, two patients with identical underlying repolarisation characteristics can appear to have very different QT intervals simply because their heart rates differ. Cardiologists and pharmacologists therefore work with a corrected QTc value that removes the rate dependence, allowing fair comparison across patients, time points, and drug studies.
Prolonged QTc is clinically significant because it indicates delayed ventricular repolarisation — a condition that can degenerate into torsades de pointes, a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that may cause syncope or sudden cardiac death. Dozens of common medications (antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, antibiotics, antihistamines) are known QT-prolonging agents, and regulatory agencies require QTc analysis in all new drug approvals under the ICH E14 guideline. Understanding the correction formula used is essential because different formulas can disagree, sometimes changing a borderline result into a prolonged one.
This calculator implements all four major correction formulas in your browser, compares them side by side, and classifies each result against the AHA/ACC 2013 sex-specific thresholds.
How it works
All four formulas share the same input: the measured QT interval in milliseconds and the heart rate in beats per minute. The RR interval (the time between successive heartbeats) is first derived:
RR (seconds) = 60 / HR
The four corrections then apply different mathematical relationships between QT and RR:
Bazett (1920): QTc = QT / sqrt(RR) — divides by the square root of RR, both in seconds. Produces the highest QTc at fast rates.
Fridericia (1920): QTc = QT / cbrt(RR) — divides by the cube root of RR. More accurate across a wide rate range; the ICH E14 preferred formula for drug trials.
Framingham (1992): QTc = QT + 0.154 * (1 - RR) in seconds, then converted to ms. A linear correction that performs well for heart rates between 50–90 bpm.
Hodges (1983): QTc = QT + 1.75 * (HR - 60) in milliseconds. Simple additive formula; widely used in Holter analysis and European practice.
Worked example
Consider a patient with a QT of 420 ms and a heart rate of 75 bpm:
- RR = 60 / 75 = 0.800 s
- Bazett: 420 / sqrt(0.800) = 420 / 0.894 = 469.7 ms — Prolonged (female) / Borderline (male)
- Fridericia: 420 / cbrt(0.800) = 420 / 0.928 = 452.5 ms — Borderline (female) / Normal (male)
- Framingham: (0.420 + 0.154 * (1 - 0.800)) * 1000 = (0.420 + 0.031) * 1000 = 451.0 ms
- Hodges: 420 + 1.75 * (75 - 60) = 420 + 26.25 = 446.3 ms
This example illustrates why formula choice matters: Bazett flags the same patient as borderline-prolonged (male) or prolonged (female), while Fridericia and Hodges place the male result solidly in the normal range. This discordance is particularly common at heart rates above 70 bpm.
| Measured QT (ms) | HR (bpm) | Bazett QTc | Fridericia QTc | Classification (male) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400 | 60 | 400.0 | 400.0 | Normal |
| 420 | 75 | 469.7 | 452.5 | Borderline / Normal |
| 440 | 90 | 481.4 | 459.0 | Prolonged / Borderline |
| 380 | 55 | 370.6 | 374.5 | Normal |
All calculations run entirely in your browser — no ECG data, patient demographics, or results are ever transmitted to a server.
Educational use only. This tool is designed to illustrate the mathematics of QT correction and to support learning. It is not a medical device and must not be used to guide clinical decisions. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional and interpret QTc values in full clinical context.